I taught Chemistry for one year, and I would normally observe an experienced teacher give her lessons before I prepared for mine so that I could get ideas and re-visit some of the material I learned during college. She was teaching combustion reactions and gave a demonstration. Mrs. Avalos used to start her lessons by first reviewing the homework from the night before. Next, she would teach the chemistry behind the material in this case she talked about the combustion reaction being one in which your burn something, a carbon based fuel. This reaction absorbs oxygen gas (O2) and it yields water, carbon dioxide and heat. After she explained the reaction, using isopropyl (rubbing alcohol), she balanced the equation (always fun, if you are a math fanatic such as me). Then, Mrs. Avalos moved on to the demonstration. She used a big water jug (like one of those used in water coolers), poured some alcohol in it, and through a lit match into it. Immediately, she blocked the mouth of the jug, told us to be very silent, and removed her hand. We all heard how the air was literally sucked into the jug (oxygen absorption), we saw the black smoke (containing CO2 and we saw the alcohol turn into water (believe me we tested it), and we touched the jug and it was hot. She then had the students write about the demo and do percentage yield problem. This lesson had it all. Direct instruction, hands on experience, individual work and amazement!. It was the best lesson I had seen in a very long time, and it taught the students and me exactly what she wanted us to learn. I learned the best through direct instruction, by seeing and by working individually.
2. In sharing your recollections and analyses with your peers, build a list of generalizations that follow from the accounts. What do well-designed learning experiences have in common? In other words, what must be built in by design for any learning experience to be maximally effective and engaging for students.
3. Where in your school or the school that you are observing are the characteristics of best design most likely to be seen in action? In what programs and subject areas would we most expect to see these characteristics, compared with other programs or subjects? Are there any patterns, If so, why?
Of the teachers that I have observed, I saw this happen in Ms. Rengifo's class. She teaches a 7th grade special ed math and science class. She has taught in my room for the last two years, and I am in the room doing my prep work. She has wonderful command of the material. She is able to break down whatever she is teaching so that the students can understand it better. Ms. Rengifo has an uncanny ability to use examples and situations in her teaching that apply to the real world. The teaching is definitely meaningful and the students can relate to it. Visual aids, videos and hands on activities are essential part of her lessons because of the population that she teaches. I think science and math definitely lend themselves to be the subjects in which you can see many, if not all, the characteristics that I look for in a lesson.
4. After a study of sample units, and one of your own designs, edit or amend your list of characteristics of the best designs, as appropriate.
I would add technology integration to the list of characteristics of a well designed lesson. I have incorporated a lot of technology to my lessons since I started this program, and the students have responded very well to it. I would say that partner work is something that can make a lesson much better, however, too much group work can backfire on lessons.
- The teacher must be knowledgeable and be comfortable with the material. Must seem flawless.
- Must be related/applied to the real world.
- Direct Instruction - to allow the teacher to show expertise.
- Teacher respects the students' opinions and questions, while staying in the topic at hand.
- There is a portion where the students can ask questions.
- Some sort of demo, or hands on activity.
- Students feel like they own their learning. They are leaders.
- Student work is appreciated and the students get to share what they learned.
3. Where in your school or the school that you are observing are the characteristics of best design most likely to be seen in action? In what programs and subject areas would we most expect to see these characteristics, compared with other programs or subjects? Are there any patterns, If so, why?
Of the teachers that I have observed, I saw this happen in Ms. Rengifo's class. She teaches a 7th grade special ed math and science class. She has taught in my room for the last two years, and I am in the room doing my prep work. She has wonderful command of the material. She is able to break down whatever she is teaching so that the students can understand it better. Ms. Rengifo has an uncanny ability to use examples and situations in her teaching that apply to the real world. The teaching is definitely meaningful and the students can relate to it. Visual aids, videos and hands on activities are essential part of her lessons because of the population that she teaches. I think science and math definitely lend themselves to be the subjects in which you can see many, if not all, the characteristics that I look for in a lesson.
4. After a study of sample units, and one of your own designs, edit or amend your list of characteristics of the best designs, as appropriate.
I would add technology integration to the list of characteristics of a well designed lesson. I have incorporated a lot of technology to my lessons since I started this program, and the students have responded very well to it. I would say that partner work is something that can make a lesson much better, however, too much group work can backfire on lessons.